|
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART THREE: |
|
|
|
THE RENAISSANCE OF OPHTHALMOLOGY IN THE |
|
|
|
EIGHTEENTH CENTURY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(§ 323) |
Introduction |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHAPTER 1: The Dispute Over the Nature of the Cataract |
|
|
(§ 324) |
Preliminary skirmishes |
5 |
|
|
The decisive battle about the new concept of the cataract and victory of the new cataract theory |
|
|
(§ 325) |
Brisseau |
10 |
|
(§ 326) |
Brisseau's work |
14 |
|
(§ 327) |
Antoine Maître-Jan |
18 |
|
(§ 328) |
The French Academy of Sciences |
19 |
|
|
The opponents of the new theory |
|
|
(§ 329) |
Thomas Woolhouse |
25 |
|
(§ 330) |
The other opponents: Hovius, Freytag, Herquet and others |
34 |
|
|
The supporters of the new theory |
|
|
|
A) Germany: |
|
|
(§ 331) |
1) Lorenz Heister |
37 |
|
|
B) Holland: |
|
|
(§ 332) |
2) Hermann Boerhaave |
41 |
|
|
C) Italy: |
|
|
|
3) Valsalva |
|
|
|
4) Morgagni |
|
|
|
5) Antonio Benevoli |
|
|
(§ 333) |
6) Antonio Celestino Cocchi |
42 |
|
(§ 334) |
The Morgagnian cataract |
47 |
|
|
D) England: |
|
|
|
7) John Taylor, |
|
|
(§ 335) |
8) W. Cheselden |
54 |
|
|
E) France: |
|
|
|
9) Sauveur-Francois Morand, |
|
|
(§ 336) |
10) Charles de Saint-Yves |
54 |
|
(§ 337) |
11) Dr. Petit |
56 |
|
(§ 338) |
Retrospective considerations about the durability of the ancient cataract theory and the final breakthrough of the new and correct concepts |
63 |
|
(§ 339) |
Bibliography |
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHAPTER TWO: Surgical Procedures on the Pupil |
|
|
(§ 340) |
Introduction |
81 |
|
(§ 341) |
William Cheselden |
81 |
|
(§ 342) |
Cheselden's operation |
83 |
|
(§ 343) |
The further development of the operation to form a new pupil.. |
89 |
|
(§ 344) |
Bibliography |
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHAPTER THREE: The Cataract Extraction |
|
|
(§ 345) |
Introduction |
143 |
|
(§ 346) |
Jacques Daviel |
149 |
|
(§ 347) |
Daviel's first publication about his cataract extraction |
158 |
|
|
Daviel's principal publication about the cataract extraction(§ 348) |
160 |
|
(§ 349) |
Daviel's discovery in the light |
172 |
|
(§ 350) |
Daviel's further activities and his improvements of the technique |
180 |
|
|
Short survey on the further development of the cataract opération |
|
|
|
The first changes in the procedure. |
|
|
(§ 351) |
General acceptance of the new opération |
191 |
|
(§ 352) |
The dispute between those favoring extraction and those favoring couching the cataract |
193 |
|
(§ 353) |
Albrecht von Graefe's linear extraction |
201 |
|
(§ 354) |
The modification of the Graefe procédure and the resurgence of the semicircular (flap) incision while maintaining a round pupil |
203 |
|
(§ 355) |
Bibliography |
206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE SECOND HALF OF THE 18th CENTURY |
|
|
|
CHAPTER ONE: France |
|
|
(§ 356) |
Introduction |
223 |
|
(§ 357) |
Brisseau |
224 |
|
(§ 358) |
Maître-Jan |
225 |
|
(§ 359) |
Charles St. Yves |
231 |
|
(§ 360) |
Anel |
246 |
|
(§ 361) |
The history of lacrimal fistules and their treatment |
249 |
|
(§ 362) |
François Pourpour du Petit and Jean Louis Petit |
266 |
|
(§ 364) |
Jaques Daviel |
271 |
|
(§ 365) |
Jaques-René Ténon |
272 |
|
(§ 366) |
Ténon's capsule |
275 |
|
(§ 366) |
Jean C. Colombier |
277 |
|
(§ 367) |
P.F.B. Pamard |
278 |
|
(§ 368) |
Méjan, Bordenave, Pouteau |
282 |
|
(§ 369) |
A. Louis. The extirpation of the eyeball |
283 |
|
(§ 370) |
Thomas Goulard and the lead water |
286 |
|
(§ 371) |
Jean Jaques Hoin |
287 |
|
(§ 372) |
Claude Nicolas le Cat |
293 |
|
(§ 373) |
Pierre Demours |
294 |
|
(§ 374) |
Antoine Demours |
298 |
|
(§ 375) |
Illustrations in textbooks of ophthalmology |
302 |
|
(§ 376) |
Louis Florentin Dehais-Gendron |
311 |
|
(§ 377) |
Pierre Guérin |
312 |
|
(§ 378) |
Jean Janin |
318 |
|
(§ 379) |
Jean Seneaux |
326 |
|
(§ 380) |
Guillaume Pellier de Quengsy |
327 |
|
(§ 381) |
Pellier's course of surgery |
331 |
|
(§ 382) |
Bourquenod, father and son |
339 |
|
(§ 383) |
Gleize |
340 |
|
(§ 384) |
Desmonceaux |
341 |
|
(§ 386) |
The French ophthalmic theses of the 18th century |
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHAPTER TWO: England |
355 |
|
(§389) |
Four books about ophthalmology appeared within a short time. |
357 |
|
(§ 391) |
Benedict Duddel |
363 |
|
(§ 392) |
Hans Sloane |
369 |
|
(§ 393) |
Hill, Mead, Monro, Pott |
370 |
|
(§ 394) |
Joseph Warner |
374 |
|
(§ 395) |
GeorgeChandler |
375 |
|
(§ 396) |
William Rowley |
375 |
|
(§ 397) |
Jonathan Wathen |
378 |
|
(§ 398) |
JamesWare |
379 |
|
(§ 399) |
Thomas Dawson |
386 |
|
(§ 400) |
Benjamin Bell (1747-1806) |
386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHAPTER THREE: Italy |
|
|
|
The famous lithotomist and ophthalmologist |
|
|
(§ 402) |
Antonio Benevoli |
391 |
|
(§ 403) |
Natalis G uiseppe Pallucci |
392 |
|
(§ 404) |
Antonio Maria Valsalva |
394 |
|
(§ 405) |
Pier Paolo Molinelli |
395 |
|
(§ 406) |
Domenico Billi |
397 |
|
(§ 407) |
Michele Troja |
401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHAPTER FOUR: Spain |
407 |
